Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) extensively contaminate the environment and can enter the food chain. Fruits and vegetables represent a significant, yet under-regulated, human exposure pathway due to the uptake of PFAS by plants from contaminated soil/water. PFAS exposure is linked to adverse health effects. EFSA has established a strict group tolerable weekly intake of 4.4 ng/kgbw/week for PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA, leading the EU to introduce specific regulations. However, EU maximum levels in plant-derived foods are lacking because the achievability of limits of quantification (LOQ) of 0.001 µg/kg poses significant analytical challenges. This study presents the results of an extensive interlaboratory validation study among European laboratories using various triple quadrupoles and high-resolution mass spectrometers. The aim was to assess method robustness and achievability of analytical LOQs required by EU guidance with a focus on the EFSA-4 PFAS. The interlaboratory validation study involved 240 food extracts prepared in two different laboratories by two operators each. The quantification was performed across four laboratories and seven analytical setups. The validated method showed robustness, with an apparent recovery between 65% and 135%, uncertainty and RSD below 25%, and consistency with current EU guidelines. The application of internal ¹³C-labeled standards and the use of very sensitive mass spectrometers proved to be a critical factor in achieving low LOQs.

An Interlaboratory Validation Study for the assessment of Low Limits of Quantification for PFAS in Foods of Plant Origin / Schiavone, Consolato; Romaniello, Francesco; Riemenschneider, Christina; Schächtele, Alexander; Rossi, Andrea Mario; Portesi, Chiara. - In: FOOD CONTROL. - ISSN 0956-7135. - (2026). [10.1016/j.foodcont.2026.112315]

An Interlaboratory Validation Study for the assessment of Low Limits of Quantification for PFAS in Foods of Plant Origin

Schiavone, Consolato;Romaniello, Francesco
;
Rossi, Andrea Mario;Portesi, Chiara
2026

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) extensively contaminate the environment and can enter the food chain. Fruits and vegetables represent a significant, yet under-regulated, human exposure pathway due to the uptake of PFAS by plants from contaminated soil/water. PFAS exposure is linked to adverse health effects. EFSA has established a strict group tolerable weekly intake of 4.4 ng/kgbw/week for PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA, leading the EU to introduce specific regulations. However, EU maximum levels in plant-derived foods are lacking because the achievability of limits of quantification (LOQ) of 0.001 µg/kg poses significant analytical challenges. This study presents the results of an extensive interlaboratory validation study among European laboratories using various triple quadrupoles and high-resolution mass spectrometers. The aim was to assess method robustness and achievability of analytical LOQs required by EU guidance with a focus on the EFSA-4 PFAS. The interlaboratory validation study involved 240 food extracts prepared in two different laboratories by two operators each. The quantification was performed across four laboratories and seven analytical setups. The validated method showed robustness, with an apparent recovery between 65% and 135%, uncertainty and RSD below 25%, and consistency with current EU guidelines. The application of internal ¹³C-labeled standards and the use of very sensitive mass spectrometers proved to be a critical factor in achieving low LOQs.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0956713526003609-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: final published article (publisher’s version)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 3.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.87 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11696/89719
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact