CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishThe CCM Force Working Group met in October 1998 in Sydney and made decisions about CIPM Key Comparisons for the unit of force. These were to cover four force ranges, with four different pilot laboratories: i) 5 kN – 10 kN Pilot: MIKES-Raute, Finland ii) 50 kN – 100 kN Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom iii) 500 kN – 1 MN Pilot: PTB, Germany iv) 2 MN – 4 MN Pilot: NIST, USA This report gives the results for Key Comparison ii), piloted by NPL and officially designated CCM.F-K2.a (Scheme A) and CCM.F-K2.b (Scheme B) by CIPM (see Section 4 for details of Scheme A and Scheme B).
Final report on force key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b (50 kN and 100 kN) / Vincke W.; Zhimin Z.; Pusa A.; Averlant P.; Kumme R.; Germak A.; Ueda K.; Park Y.K.; Torres J.; Burke B.; Langmead F.; Fank S.; Knott A.; Bartel T.. - In: METROLOGIA. - ISSN 1681-7575. - 49:iSUUE 1a (Technical Supplement 2012)(2012).
| Titolo: | Final report on force key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b (50 kN and 100 kN) |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2012 |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | Final report on force key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b (50 kN and 100 kN) / Vincke W.; Zhimin Z.; Pusa A.; Averlant P.; Kumme R.; Germak A.; Ueda K.; Park Y.K.; Torres J.; Burke B.; Langmead F.; Fank S.; Knott A.; Bartel T.. - In: METROLOGIA. - ISSN 1681-7575. - 49:iSUUE 1a (Technical Supplement 2012)(2012). |
| Abstract: | The CCM Force Working Group met in October 1998 in Sydney and made decisions about CIPM Key Comparisons for the unit of force. These were to cover four force ranges, with four different pilot laboratories: i) 5 kN – 10 kN Pilot: MIKES-Raute, Finland ii) 50 kN – 100 kN Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom iii) 500 kN – 1 MN Pilot: PTB, Germany iv) 2 MN – 4 MN Pilot: NIST, USA This report gives the results for Key Comparison ii), piloted by NPL and officially designated CCM.F-K2.a (Scheme A) and CCM.F-K2.b (Scheme B) by CIPM (see Section 4 for details of Scheme A and Scheme B). |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11696/34513 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/11696/34513
Copyright © 2020