Purpose: The goal of this study was to conduct an exposure assessment for workers moving through the stray stationary field of common MRI scanners, performed according to the recent International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines, which aim at avoiding annoying sensory effects. Theory and Methods: The analysis was performed through numerical simulations, using a high-resolution anatomical model that moved along realistic trajectories in proximity to a tubular and open MRI scanner. Both dosimetric indexes indicated by ICNIRP (maximum variation of the magnetic flux density vector and exposure index for the motion-induced electric field) were computed for three statures of the human model. Results: A total of 51 exposure situations were analyzed. None of them exceeded the limit for the maximum variation of the magnetic flux density, whereas some critical cases were found when computing the induced electric field. In the latter case, the exposure indexes computed via Fourier transform and through an equivalent filter result to be consistent. Conclusion: The results suggest the adoption of some simple precautionary rules, useful when sensory effects experienced by an operator could reflect upon the patient’s safety. Moreover, some open issues regarding the quantification of motioninduced fields are highlighted, putting in evidence the need for clarification at standardization level.

Assessment of Exposure to MRI Motion-Induced Fields Based on the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines / Zilberti, Luca; Bottauscio, Oriano; Chiampi, M.. - In: MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE. - ISSN 0740-3194. - 76:4(2016), pp. 1291-1300. [10.1002/mrm.26031]

Assessment of Exposure to MRI Motion-Induced Fields Based on the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines

ZILBERTI, LUCA;BOTTAUSCIO, ORIANO;
2016

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to conduct an exposure assessment for workers moving through the stray stationary field of common MRI scanners, performed according to the recent International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines, which aim at avoiding annoying sensory effects. Theory and Methods: The analysis was performed through numerical simulations, using a high-resolution anatomical model that moved along realistic trajectories in proximity to a tubular and open MRI scanner. Both dosimetric indexes indicated by ICNIRP (maximum variation of the magnetic flux density vector and exposure index for the motion-induced electric field) were computed for three statures of the human model. Results: A total of 51 exposure situations were analyzed. None of them exceeded the limit for the maximum variation of the magnetic flux density, whereas some critical cases were found when computing the induced electric field. In the latter case, the exposure indexes computed via Fourier transform and through an equivalent filter result to be consistent. Conclusion: The results suggest the adoption of some simple precautionary rules, useful when sensory effects experienced by an operator could reflect upon the patient’s safety. Moreover, some open issues regarding the quantification of motioninduced fields are highlighted, putting in evidence the need for clarification at standardization level.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
00264_MRM_2015.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione editoriale
Licenza: Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 886.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
MRM_Pre-print.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 726.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
726.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11696/29046
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact